Quarterly
Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
FOR QUARTER ENDED October 29, 2005 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9656
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MICHIGAN 38-0751137Registrant's telephone number, including area code (734)
242-1444
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes X NoIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes No X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each issuers classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:
Class
Outstanding at October 29,
2005
Common Shares, $1.00 par value
51,637,131
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number(s) | |
---|---|
PART I Financial Information | |
Item 1. Financial Statements | |
Consolidated Statement of Operations | 4-5 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet | 6 |
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | 7 |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity | 8 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | |
Note 1. Basis of Presentation | 9 |
Note 2. Interim Results | 9 |
Note 3. Reclassification | 9 |
Note 4. Earnings per Share | 9 |
Note 5. Inventories | 10 |
Note 6. Restructuring | 10-11 |
Note 7. Segment Information | 12 |
Note 8. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets | 13 |
Note 9. Stock Plans | 13-14 |
Note 10. Financial Guarantees and Product Warranties | 14 |
Note 11. Variable Interest Entities | 15 |
Note 12. Pension Plans | 15 |
Note 13. Dispositions | 16 |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition | |
and Results of Operations | |
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements | 17 |
Introduction | 17-19 |
Results of Operations | 20-26 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources | 27-28 |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 28 |
Restructuring | 28-29 |
Critical Accounting Policies | 29 |
Outlook | 29 |
Item 3. Quantitative & Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 29 |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | 29 |
PART II Other Information | |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 29-30 |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 30 |
Item 6. Exhibits | 30 |
Signature Page | 31 |
Item 1. Financial Statements
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Second Quarter Ended
| |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% Over | Percent of Sales
| ||||||||||||||||
10/29/05
|
10/23/04
|
(Under)
|
10/29/05
|
10/23/04
| |||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 454,605 | $ | 520,760 | -12.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Cost of sales | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 354,409 | 400,834 | -11.6 | % | 78.0 | % | 77.0 | % | |||||||||
Restructuring | 7,817 | 749 | 943.7 | % | 1.7 | % | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 362,226 | 401,583 | -9.8 | % | 79.7 | % | 77.1 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 92,379 | 119,177 | -22.5 | % | 20.3 | % | 22.9 | % | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 99,597 | 103,874 | -4.1 | % | 21.9 | % | 19.9 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (7,218 | ) | 15,303 | -147.2 | % | -1.6 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense | 3,090 | 2,607 | 18.5 | % | 0.7 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net | 295 | (354 | ) | 183.3 | % | 0.1 | % | -0.1 | % | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
(10,013 | ) | 12,342 | -181.1 | % | -2.2 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (3,566 | ) | 4,690 | -176.0 | % | 35.6 | %* | 38.0 | %* | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
(6,447 | ) | 7,652 | -184.3 | % | -1.4 | % | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax) |
-- | 506 | -100.0 | % | -- | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Extraordinary gains (net of tax) | -- | 702 | -100.0 | % | -- | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | 8,860 | -172.8 | % | -1.4 | % | 1.7 | % | ||||||
|
|
Basic average shares | 51,655 | 52,040 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.15 | |||
Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.17 | |||
|
|
|||||||
Diluted average shares | 51,655 | 52,101 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.15 | |||
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.17 | |||
|
|
|||||||
Dividends paid per share | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.11 |
*As a percent of pretax income, not sales.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data)
Six Months Ended
| |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% Over | Percent of Sales
| ||||||||||||||||
10/29/05
|
10/23/04
|
(Under)
|
10/29/05
|
10/23/04
| |||||||||||||
Sales | $ | 906,092 | $ | 975,867 | -7.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||
Cost of sales | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 699,427 | 752,550 | -7.1 | % | 77.2 | % | 77.1 | % | |||||||||
Restructuring | 7,817 | 11,149 | -29.9 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.1 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total cost of sales | 707,244 | 763,699 | -7.4 | % | 78.1 | % | 78.3 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross profit | 198,848 | 212,168 | -6.3 | % | 21.9 | % | 21.7 | % | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 198,165 | 200,919 | -1.4 | % | 21.9 | % | 20.6 | % | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Operating income | 683 | 11,249 | -93.9 | % | 0.1 | % | 1.2 | % | |||||||||
Interest expense | 5,831 | 4,816 | 21.1 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||
Other income, net | 310 | 19 | N/M | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
(4,838 | ) | 6,452 | -175.0 | % | -0.5 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | (1,599 | ) | 2,452 | -165.2 | % | 33.1 | %* | 38.0 | %* | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
(3,239 | ) | 4,000 | -181.0 | % | -0.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations (net of tax) |
-- | 635 | -100.0 | % | -- | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Extraordinary gains (net of tax) | -- | 702 | -100.0 | % | -- | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (3,239 | ) | $ | 5,337 | -160.7 | % | -0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||
|
|
Basic average shares | 51,892 | 52,003 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share |
$ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |||
Basic net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.10 | |||
|
|
|||||||
Diluted average shares | 51,892 | 52,062 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share |
$ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | |||
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.10 | |||
|
|
|||||||
Dividends paid per share | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 |
*As a percent of pretax
income, not sales.
N/M = not meaningful
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
Increase/(Decrease)
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/29/05
|
10/23/04 |
Dollars
|
Percent
|
4/30/05
| |||||||||||||
Current assets | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents | $ | 15,037 | $ | 28,677 | $ | (13,640 | ) | -47.6 | % | $ | 37,705 | ||||||
Receivables, net | 258,518 | 306,386 | (47,868 | ) | -15.6 | % | 283,915 | ||||||||||
Inventories, net | 267,320 | 282,470 | (15,150 | ) | -5.4 | % | 260,556 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 27,247 | 38,108 | (10,861 | ) | -28.5 | % | 22,779 | ||||||||||
Other current assets | 30,676 | 21,088 | 9,588 | 45.5 | % | 33,410 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total current assets | 598,798 | 676,729 | (77,931 | ) | -11.5 | % | 638,365 | ||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 214,552 | 207,447 | 7,105 | 3.4 | % | 210,565 | |||||||||||
Goodwill | 79,770 | 68,544 | 11,226 | 16.4 | % | 79,362 | |||||||||||
Trade names | 18,794 | 27,889 | (9,095 | ) | -32.6 | % | 21,484 | ||||||||||
Other long-term assets | 84,214 | 81,348 | 2,866 | 3.5 | % | 76,581 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 996,128 | $ | 1,061,957 | $ | (65,829 | ) | -6.2 | % | $ | 1,026,357 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 30,835 | $ | 33,686 | $ | (2,851 | ) | -8.5 | % | $ | 9,700 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term | |||||||||||||||||
debt | 1,965 | 3,018 | (1,053 | ) | -34.9 | % | 3,060 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable | 73,397 | 86,716 | (13,319 | ) | -15.4 | % | 82,792 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other | |||||||||||||||||
current liabilities | 130,154 | 126,992 | 3,162 | 2.5 | % | 133,172 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | 236,351 | 250,412 | (14,061 | ) | -5.6 | % | 228,724 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt | 194,533 | 231,652 | (37,119 | ) | -16.0 | % | 213,549 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 4,599 | 20,143 | (15,544 | ) | -77.2 | % | 5,389 | ||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 56,361 | 41,462 | 14,899 | 35.9 | % | 51,409 | |||||||||||
Contingencies and commitments | |||||||||||||||||
Shareholders' equity | |||||||||||||||||
Common shares, $1 par value | 51,637 | 52,088 | (451 | ) | -0.9 | % | 52,225 | ||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value | 211,838 | 214,962 | (3,124 | ) | -1.5 | % | 214,087 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings | 254,855 | 250,434 | 4,421 | 1.8 | % | 273,143 | |||||||||||
Unearned compensation | (3,534 | ) | (1,938 | ) | (1,596 | ) | -82.4 | % | (1,536 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) |
(10,512 | ) | 2,742 | (13,254 | ) | -483.4 | % | (10,633 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 504,284 | 518,288 | (14,004 | ) | -2.7 | % | 527,286 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total liabilities and | |||||||||||||||||
shareholders' equity | $ | 996,128 | $ | 1,061,957 | $ | (65,829 | ) | -6.2 | % | $ | 1,026,357 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
N/M = not meaningful
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral
part of these statements.
6
LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited,
amounts in thousands)
Second Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 | |||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | 8,860 | $ | (3,239 | ) | $ | 5,337 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to | ||||||||||||||
cash provided by (used for) operating activities | ||||||||||||||
Extraordinary gain | -- | (702 | ) | -- | (702 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring | 7,817 | 749 | 7,817 | 11,149 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 7,178 | 7,092 | 14,176 | 14,000 | ||||||||||
Change in receivables | (6,292 | ) | (55,811 | ) | 28,550 | (4,371 | ) | |||||||
Change in inventories | (2,581 | ) | (6,618 | ) | (3,362 | ) | (33,902 | ) | ||||||
Change in payables | 4,055 | 1,530 | (9,904 | ) | (6,582 | ) | ||||||||
Change in other assets and liabilities | (2,683 | ) | 21,040 | (9,984 | ) | (8,803 | ) | |||||||
Change in deferred taxes | (2,020 | ) | 4,712 | (5,258 | ) | (215 | ) | |||||||
Total adjustments | 5,474 | (28,008 | ) | 22,035 | (29,426 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | (973 | ) | (19,148 | ) | 18,796 | (24,089 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of assets | 7,718 | 5,329 | 7,720 | 5,597 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditures | (7,570 | ) | (7,705 | ) | (14,283 | ) | (17,179 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (3,622 | ) | (3,856 | ) | (15,560 | ) | (5,362 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 1,925 | 274 | 4,068 | 2,813 | ||||||||||
Change in other long-term assets | (1,236 | ) | 527 | (3,301 | ) | (1,301 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used for investing activities | (2,785 | ) | (5,431 | ) | (21,356 | ) | (15,432 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from debt | 26,058 | 32,499 | 72,137 | 102,242 | ||||||||||
Payments on debt | (18,214 | ) | (4,841 | ) | (72,119 | ) | (58,257 | ) | ||||||
Stock issued for stock option and employee benefits plans | 1,045 | 1,275 | 2,045 | 2,757 | ||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (3,642 | ) | -- | (10,889 | ) | (2,476 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid | (5,714 | ) | (5,723 | ) | (11,472 | ) | (11,372 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing | ||||||||||||||
activities | (467 | ) | 23,210 | (20,298 | ) | 32,894 | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and | ||||||||||||||
equivalents | 251 | 1,081 | 190 | 1,422 | ||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and equivalents | (3,974 | ) | (288 | ) | (22,668 | ) | (5,205 | ) | ||||||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period | 19,011 | 28,965 | 37,705 | 33,882 | ||||||||||
Cash and equivalents at end of period | $ | 15,037 | $ | 28,677 | $ | 15,037 | $ | 28,677 | ||||||
Cash paid (net of refunds) during period - income taxes | $ | 7,224 | $ | (1,016 | ) | $ | 1,591 | $ | 6,398 | |||||
Cash paid during period - interest | $ | 2,088 | $ | 1,508 | $ | 5,310 | $ | 4,060 | ||||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
LA-Z-BOY
INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
Common shares
|
Capital in excess of par value |
Retained earnings |
Unearned Compensation
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) |
Total
| |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At April 24, 2004 | $ | 52,031 | $ | 216,156 | $ | 253,012 | $ | -- | $ | 1,129 | $ | 522,328 | ||||||||
Repurchases of common stock | (120 | ) | (2,356 | ) | (2,476 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock issued for stock and employee benefit plans | 314 | (2,063 | ) | 8,170 | (1,848 | ) | 4,573 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation | 312 | 312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of options | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | (22,868 | ) | (22,868 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 37,185 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||
securities (net of tax) | 127 | |||||||||||||||||||
Realization of gains on marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||
securities (net of tax) | (93 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Additional minimum pension | ||||||||||||||||||||
liability (net of tax) | (14,144 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | 2,359 | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of cash | ||||||||||||||||||||
flow hedges (net of tax) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 25,423 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
At April 30, 2005 | 52,225 | 214,087 | 273,143 | (1,536 | ) | (10,633 | ) | 527,286 | ||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock | (760 | ) | (10,129 | ) | (10,889 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock issued for stock and
employee benefit plans |
172 | (2,249 | ) | 6,552 | (2,430 | ) | 2,045 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of
unearned compensation |
432 | 432 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | (11,472 | ) | (11,472 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss | (3,239 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities (net of tax) | 325 | |||||||||||||||||||
Realization of gains on marketable | ||||||||||||||||||||
securities (net of tax) | (59 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment | (61 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of cash | ||||||||||||||||||||
flow hedges (net of tax) | (84 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss | (3,118 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
At October 29, 2005 | $ | 51,637 | $ | 211,838 | $ | 254,855 | $ | (3,534 | ) | $ | (10,512 | ) | $ | 504,284 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial information is prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and such principles are applied on a basis consistent with those reflected in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, but does not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, the interim financial information includes all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the respective interim period.
The foregoing interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations which will occur for the full fiscal year ending April 29, 2006.
Certain prior year information has been reclassified to be comparable with the current year presentation. Most significantly, our consolidated statement of operations has been reclassified for our discontinued operations.
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share uses the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the additional common shares that would be outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares issuable under employee stock options were issued. A reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding follows:
Second Quarter Ended |
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares | |||||||||||||
outstanding (basic) | 51,655 | 52,040 | 51,892 | 52,003 | |||||||||
Effect of options | -- | 61 | -- | 59 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares | |||||||||||||
outstanding (diluted) | 51,655 | 52,101 | 51,892 | 52,062 | |||||||||
9
A summary of inventory follows:
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
4/30/05
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw materials | $ | 65,720 | $ | 75,152 | $ | 69,350 | |||||
Work in progress | 57,472 | 64,388 | 56,655 | ||||||||
Finished goods | 164,856 | 160,746 | 155,114 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
FIFO inventories | 288,048 | 300,286 | 281,119 | ||||||||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO | (20,728 | ) | (17,816 | ) | (20,563 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Inventories, net | $ | 267,320 | $ | 282,470 | $ | 260,556 | |||||
|
|
|
In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the decision was made to close our Canadian upholstery manufacturing facility due to underutilization of capacity. The plant closure will occur in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and production will be absorbed in other upholstery facilities resulting in better production efficiencies. Approximately 413 jobs are expected to be eliminated as a result of this closure. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, pre-tax restructuring charges were $8.0 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, covering severance and benefits, appropriate adjustments to our pension liability and the write-down of certain fixed assets. Severance costs and other costs were expensed in accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits and SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. There were 380 employees remaining at this facility as of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006. We expect to dispose of this plant by sale. The write-down was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Somewhat offsetting the expense for the Canadian restructuring was a gain of $0.2 million relating to the sale of a facility idled as part of a previous restructuring.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the decision was made to close three casegoods facilities, an upholstery plant and an upholstery warehouse. The casegoods facilities were closed as a result of continued underutilization of our domestic casegoods facilities due to an increase in our importing of product from overseas. The upholstery plant was closed and production was absorbed in another upholstery facility resulting in better production efficiencies. The casegoods plants were closed in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Approximately 525 jobs were eliminated as a result of these closures. During fiscal 2005, pre-tax restructuring charges were $10.3 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, covering the following: write-down of certain fixed assets, write-down of certain inventories, payment of severance and benefits and other costs related to the shut down. The restructuring expenses during 2005 were lower than we had originally anticipated because our charges to expense were offset by the gains on sale of assets in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 previously written down through restructuring. The remaining assets relating to the restructurings were classified in assets held for sale. We expect to dispose of these plants by sale or abandonment if a sale is not practical. The write-down was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Severance costs and other costs were expensed as incurred throughout fiscal 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
10
Fiscal 2006 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) |
4/30/05 Balance |
Charges to Expense |
Cash Payments or Asset Write-offs |
10/29/05 Balance | ||||||||||
Fixed asset write-downs, net of gains | $ | -- | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 9 | $ | -- | |||||
Severance and benefit related costs | 38 | 7,826 | (38 | ) | 7,826 | |||||||||
Total restructuring | $ | 38 | $ | 7,817 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 7,826 | |||||
Fiscal 2005 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 4/24/04 Balance |
Charges to Expense |
Cash Payments or Asset Write-offs |
4/30/05 Balance | |||||||||
Fixed asset write-downs, net of gains | $ | -- | $ | 4,619 | $ | (4,619 | ) | $ | -- | ||||
Severance and benefit related costs | 329 | 1,700 | (1,991 | ) | 38 | ||||||||
Inventory write-downs | -- | 2,450 | (2,450 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Other | 174 | 1,525 | (1,699 | ) | -- | ||||||||
Total restructuring | $ | 503 | $ | 10,294 | $ | (10,759 | ) | $ | 38 | ||||
11
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery Group, the Casegoods Group and the Retail Group. We acquired 21 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Combining these recent acquisitions with existing company-owned stores, the retail operations became a significant part of our business. Management determined based on the significance of the retail operations and the criteria of segment reporting as outlined in SFAS 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, that retail will be reported in its own segment. We have changed our internal reporting structure to the following three segments: Upholstery, Casegoods and Retail. All quarterly segment data was restated to reflect this change.
Upholstery Group. The operating units in the Upholstery Group are Bauhaus, Clayton Marcus, England, La-Z-Boy, La-Z-Boy UK and Sam Moore. This group primarily manufactures and sells upholstered furniture to furniture retailers. Upholstered furniture includes recliners and motion furniture, sofas, loveseats, chairs, ottomans and sleeper sofas.
Casegoods Group. The operating units in the Casegoods Group are American Drew, American of Martinsville, Hammary, Kincaid, Lea and Pennsylvania House. This group primarily sells manufactured or imported wood furniture to furniture retailers and the hospitality industry. Casegoods product includes tables, chairs, entertainment centers, headboards, dressers, accent pieces and some coordinated upholstered furniture for the residential and hospitality markets.
Retail Group. The Retail Group consists of 61 company owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores. The Retail Group sells mostly upholstered furniture to end consumers through the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores retail network (the retail network).
Second Quarter Ended |
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 | ||||||||||
Sales | ||||||||||||||
Upholstery Group | $ | 320,368 | $ | 380,726 | $ | 634,849 | $ | 697,564 | ||||||
Casegoods Group | 103,940 | 114,169 | 208,937 | 219,883 | ||||||||||
Retail Group | 49,245 | 40,960 | 101,900 | 79,416 | ||||||||||
VIEs/Eliminations | (18,948 | ) | (15,095 | ) | (39,594 | ) | (20,996 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated | $ | 454,605 | $ | 520,760 | $ | 906,092 | $ | 975,867 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) | ||||||||||||||
Upholstery Group | $ | 12,464 | $ | 27,475 | 27,718 | $ | 40,673 | |||||||
Casegoods Group | 2,113 | 80 | 6,457 | 580 | ||||||||||
Retail Group | (6,074 | ) | 510 | (11,482 | ) | 1,025 | ||||||||
Corporate and other* | (7,904 | ) | (12,013 | ) | (14,193 | ) | (19,880 | ) | ||||||
Restructuring | (7,817 | ) | (749 | ) | (7,817 | ) | (11,149 | ) | ||||||
Consolidated | $ | (7,218 | ) | $ | 15,303 | $ | 683 | $ | 11,249 | |||||
*Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs") are included in corporate and other.
12
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, trade names are tested at least annually for impairment by comparing their fair value to their carrying values. The fair value for each trade name is established based upon a royalty savings approach. Additionally, goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of our operating units to their carrying values. The fair value for each operating unit is established based upon a combination of the discounted cash flows and the projected profitability of the market in which the entity operates.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we acquired several La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores that were independently owned. Relating to these acquisitions, we recorded goodwill of $11.3 million in fiscal 2005. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, we completed a valuation of the tax reserves relating to an acquisition in fiscal 2000. Due to the resolution of certain open tax items relating to the acquisition, a reduction of the tax reserves was required during fiscal 2005. These reductions in the tax reserves were recorded as a reduction in the remaining acquired intangible assets, which consisted of trade names and totaled $6.4 million. Furthermore, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the annual evaluation of goodwill and trade names was performed. We determined that goodwill and trade names were not impaired as of the end of fiscal 2005.
At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we began consolidating a new VIE that had goodwill of $0.4 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we sold our Englander trade name of $2.7 million, which was included in our Upholstery Group.
The following table summarizes goodwill and trade names at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006, second quarter of fiscal 2005 and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005:
Goodwill |
Tradenames |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
4/30/05
|
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
4/30/05
| ||||||||||||||
Upholstery Group | $ | 49,654 | $ | 49,736 | $ | 49,654 | $ | 4,475 | $ | 8,690 | $ | 7,165 | ||||||||
Casegoods Group | -- | -- | -- | 14,319 | 19,199 | 14,319 | ||||||||||||||
Retail Group | 21,994 | 11,094 | 21,994 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||
Corporate and Other | 8,122 | 7,714 | 7,714 | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Consolidated | $ | 79,770 | $ | 68,544 | $ | 79,362 | $ | 18,794 | $ | 27,889 | $ | 21,484 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
We account for our stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method of recognition and measurement principles under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. We adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure.
13
Assuming that we had accounted for our stock-based compensation programs using the fair value method promulgated by SFAS No. 123, pro forma net income and net income per share would have been as follows:
Second Quarter Ended |
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share data) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | 8,860 | $ | (3,239 | ) | $ | 5,337 | ||||
Fair value of stock plans | (470 | ) | (624 | ) | (915 | ) | (1,085 | ) | ||||||
Proforma net income | $ | (6,917 | ) | $ | 8,236 | $ | (4,154 | ) | $ | 4,252 | ||||
Proforma basic net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.16 | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.08 | ||||
Proforma diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.16 | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.08 |
We have provided secured and unsecured financial guarantees relating to loans and leases in connection with certain La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores, which are not operated by the company. Loan guarantees are generally for real estate mortgages with a guarantee period of not more than five years. Lease guarantees are generally for real estate leases and have terms lasting up to five years. These loan and lease guarantees enhance the credit of these dealers. The dealer is required to make periodic fee payments to compensate us for our guarantees. We have recognized liabilities for the fair values of the loan and lease agreements that we have entered into since December 31, 2002, but they are not material to our financial position.
We would be required to perform under these agreements only if the dealer were to default on the loan or lease. The maximum amounts of potential future payments under loan guarantees and lease guarantees were $1.7 million and $6.0 million, respectively, as of October 29, 2005. Should a default occur on a collateralized loan, we expect the liquidation of the collateral would cover substantially all of the maximum amount of our potential future payments under our guarantee obligation.
We have, from time to time, entered into agreements which resulted in indemnifying third parties against certain liabilities, mainly environmental obligations. We believe that judgments, if any, against us related to such agreements would not have a material effect on our business or financial condition.
Our accounting policy for product warranties is to accrue an estimated liability at the time the revenue is recognized. This estimate is based on historical claims and adjusted for currently known warranty issues.
A reconciliation of the changes in our product warranty liability is as follows:
Second Quarter Ended |
Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
||||||||||
Balance as of beginning of the period | $ | 19,250 | $ | 19,685 | $ | 18,688 | $ | 19,527 | ||||||
Accruals during the period | 3,907 | 3,540 | 7,628 | 7,819 | ||||||||||
Settlements during the period | (3,652 | ) | (3,511 | ) | (6,811 | ) | (7,632 | ) | ||||||
Balance as of the end of the period | $ | 19,505 | $ | 19,714 | $ | 19,505 | $ | 19,714 | ||||||
14
Note 11: Variable Interest Entities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities ("FIN 46"), which was issued in December 2003, requires the "primary beneficiary" of a VIE to include the VIE's assets, liabilities and operating results in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is a company, partnership, limited-liability corporation, trust or any other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (a) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (b) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (c) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations.
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores that are not operated by us are operated by independent dealers. These stores sell La-Z-Boy manufactured product as well as various accessories purchased from approved La-Z-Boy vendors. In some cases we have extended credit beyond normal trade terms to the independent dealers, made direct loans and/or guaranteed certain loans or leases. Most of these independent dealers have sufficient equity to carry out their principal operating activities without subordinated financial support. However, there are certain independent dealers that we have determined may not have sufficient equity. Based on the criteria for consolidation of VIEs, we determined that, as of April 24, 2004, several dealers were VIEs of which, under FIN 46, we were deemed the primary beneficiary. In fiscal 2005, we acquired some VIEs or we found a new independent dealer with sufficient equity to own and operate that market of La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores. We became the primary beneficiary of one of our dealers at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to a change in financial structure of the dealer.
Additionally, there are certain independent dealers that qualify as VIEs; however, we are not the primary beneficiary. Our interest in these dealers is comprised of accounts and notes receivable of $22.6 million. In prior years, we have evaluated the collectibility of our trade accounts receivable from our independent dealers and have provided an appropriate reserve relating to the collectibility of our receivables with these dealers or the contingent payout under any guarantees.
Since some of our VIEs have either negative or no equity in their business, we are required to absorb their losses in our consolidated statement of operations. Our consolidated VIEs contributed $7.8 million and $9.7 million in sales, net of intercompany eliminations, during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively and $16.4 million and $23.3 million in sales, net of intercompany eliminations, during the first six months of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. We also had a net loss per diluted share of $0.03 and $0.05 during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, and a net loss per diluted share of $0.05 and $0.09 during the first six months of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, resulting from operating results of our consolidated VIEs. The VIEs had $9.2 million and $10.2 million of assets after eliminations of intercompany activity as of October 29, 2005 and April 30, 2005, respectively.
Note 12: Pension Plans
The
net periodic pension costs were as follows:
Second Quarter Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | 10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 | |||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 697 | $ | 699 | $ | 1,512 | $ | 1,450 | |||||||
Interest cost | 1,223 | 1,088 | 2,444 | 2,238 | |||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (1,626 | ) | (1,510 | ) | (3,250 | ) | (3,095 | ) | |||||||
Net amortization and deferral | 293 | 33 | 586 | 99 | |||||||||||
SFAS 88 curtailment | 708 | -- | 708 | -- | |||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost | $ | 1,295 | $ | 310 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 692 | |||||||
We are not required to
make any contributions to the defined benefit plans in fiscal year 2006, however
we reserve the right to make discretionary contributions.
There were no contributions made to the plans in the first six
months of fiscal 2006. The curtailment shown in the table above relates to the
restructuring discussed previously in Note 6.
15
Note 13: Dispositions
On April 29, 2005, we completed the sale of our La-Z-Boy Contract operating unit for $11.0 million in cash and a note for $0.7 million. This disposition qualified for discontinued operations treatment under SFAS 144. Accordingly, the consolidated statement of operations for the prior year has been reclassified to reflect the results of operations of this divested business as a discontinued operation. La-Z-Boy Contract had $12.9 million and $24.2 million in sales in the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005, respectively. The assets and liabilities of this operating unit have not been reclassified for fiscal 2005. In the consolidated statement of cash flows, the cash flows of discontinued operations were not reclassified for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2005.
16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our managements discussion and analysis is an integral part of understanding our financial results. This Managements Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We begin the Managements Discussion and Analysis with a cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements, followed by an introduction of La-Z-Boy Incorporateds key businesses, strategies and significant operational events in fiscal 2006. We then provide a discussion on our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, recent accounting pronouncements, critical accounting policies and our business outlook.
We are making forward-looking statements in this item. Generally, forward-looking statements include information concerning possible or assumed future actions, events or results of operations. More specifically, forward-looking statements include the information in this document regarding:
future income, margins and cash flows | future economic performance |
future growth | industry and importing trends |
adequacy and cost of financial resources | management plans |
Forward-looking statements also include those preceded or followed by the words "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "hopes," "plans," "intends" and "expects" or similar expressions. With respect to all forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or projected due to a number of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to: (a) changes in consumer confidence; (b) changes in demographics; (c) changes in housing sales; (d) the impact of terrorism or war; (e) energy price changes; (f) the impact of logistics on imports; (g) the impact of interest rate changes; (h) the potential disruptions from Chinese imports; (i) inventory supply price fluctuations; (j) the impact of imports as it relates to continued domestic production; (k) changes in currency rates; (l) competitive factors; (m) operating factors, such as supply, labor, or distribution disruptions including changes in operating conditions or costs; (n) effects of restructuring actions; (o) changes in the domestic or international regulatory environment; (p) not fully realizing cost reductions through restructurings; (q) ability to implement global sourcing organization strategies; (r) the impact of new manufacturing technologies; (s) the future financial performance and condition of independently operated dealers that we are required to consolidate into our financial statements or changes requiring us to consolidate additional independently operated dealers; (t) fair value changes to our intangible assets due to actual results differing from projected; (u) the impact of adopting new accounting principles; (v) the impact from severe weather such as hurricanes and tornadoes; (w) the ability to turn around under-performing stores; (x) the impact of store relocation costs or the success of new stores; and (y) factors relating to acquisitions and other factors identified from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, either to reflect new developments, or for any other reason.
La-Z-Boy Incorporated is a manufacturer and marketer of upholstery product and a marketer of imported or manufactured casegoods (wood) furniture products. Our La-Z-Boy brand is the top brand in the furniture industry, one of the most preferred brands in the home and we are the leading global producer of reclining chairs. In addition, we own 61 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries stores which are retail locations dedicated to marketing our La-Z-Boy branded product. These 61 stores are part of the larger store network of La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries stores which includes a total of 329 stores. The network is the industry's largest single upholstery source furniture retailer in North America. These stores combine the style, comfort and quality of La-Z-Boy furniture with a design center to help customers furnish certain rooms in their home.
Our reportable operating segments are the Upholstery Group, the Casegoods Group and the Retail Group. We acquired 21 La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Combining these recent acquisitions with existing company-owned stores, the retail operations became a significant part of our business. Management determined based on the significance of the retail operations and the criteria of segment reporting as outlined in SFAS 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, that retail will be reported in its own segment. We have changed our internal reporting structure to the following three segments: Upholstery, Casegoods and Retail. Below is a chart that shows the organizational structure of La-Z-Boy's three segments.
In terms of revenue, our largest segment is the Upholstery Group, which includes La-Z-Boy Residential, our largest operating unit. During the current quarter we announced a restructuring plan to close our upholstery manufacturing facility in Waterloo, Ontario and shift the plant's production to other existing facilities in order to bolster our overall capacity utilization. We also import cut and sewn kits for fabric to complement our leather kits that will take full advantage of both the cost opportunities presented in Asia and the speed to market advantages of a United States manufacturing base. The Upholstery group sells furniture mainly to La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores, general dealers, and department stores.
Our Casegoods Group continues to make progress in year over year quarterly improvements in operating margin. By the end of fiscal 2006, we expect to be transitioned to an importer, blended with domestic manufacturing, so that approximately 75% of our residential casegoods finished goods will be imported. For the second quarter of fiscal 2006, 71% of our residential casegoods finished goods were imported, compared to 52% imported during the second quarter of fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2005, we continued to rationalize our casegoods manufacturing capacities as we closed our two Pennsylvania House facilities and a Kincaid facility in Hudson, NC. With the continuing change in worldwide supply, we were no longer competitive manufacturing certain products domestically and it became necessary to close these plants.
The Retail Group consists of company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores in nine markets ranging from the Midwest to East Coast of the United States. This group includes the 21 stores acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. In two of those markets, the stores were previously consolidated as VIE's and were incurring significant operating losses. In the next few quarters, we plan to take the following actions to grow sales and improve the operating results for the Retail Group as well as take advantage of certain synergies between the company-owned markets:
o | We will relocate, convert or add stores to our New Generation format stores which are more productive. |
o | We are in the process of centralizing certain of our advertising, marketing and warehousing functions to gain better efficiencies. | ||
o | We are continuing to consolidate information systems and eliminate duplicative processes in future quarters. | ||
o | We will continue to expand our In Home Design Services, which has increased the average sale per customer where employed. | ||
o | We have recently launched an interactive website for the entire network of La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores with benchmarks and best practices in every facet of the retail furniture business to drive growth and profitability. |
We believe that expanding our store network will generate the long term benefit of driving top-line growth as we capitalize on the larger urban markets. With the further penetration in these markets we expect to gain necessary efficiencies in advertising, distribution and administration to achieve desired profitability. Currently, 23 of our company-owned stores are in the New Generation format. Through these actions we continue to remain optimistic about the future performance of this new segment, although it may take several quarters to return this segment to profitability.
At the end of fiscal 2004, a new accounting pronouncement, Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, required us to start consolidating certain of our independent dealers who did not have sufficient equity to carry out their principal business activities without our financial support. During the 2006 first quarter, one of our independent dealers had a change in financial structure, which made us the primary beneficiary and required consolidation. The new VIE currently has three stores but is also planning to expand operations in one of our top 25 focus markets in North America. The chart below shows the current structure of the La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® store network.
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | Quarter ended |
Percent change |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
|
|||||||||
Upholstery sales | $ | 320,368 | $ | 380,726 | -15.9% | ||||||
Casegoods sales | 103,940 | 114,169 | -9.0% | ||||||||
Retail sales | 49,245 | 40,960 | 20.2% | ||||||||
VIEs/eliminations | (18,948 | ) | (15,095 | ) | N/M | ||||||
Consolidated sales | $ | 454,605 | $ | 520,760 | -12.7% | ||||||
Consolidated gross profit | $ | 92,379 | $ | 119,177 | -22.5% | ||||||
Consolidated gross margin | 20.3% | 22.9% | |||||||||
Consolidated S, G& A | $ | 99,597 | $ | 103,874 | -4.1% | ||||||
S,G& A as a percent of sales | 21.9% | 19.9% | |||||||||
Upholstery operating income | $ | 12,464 | $ | 27,475 | -54.6% | ||||||
Casegoods operating income | 2,113 | 80 | 2541.3% | ||||||||
Retail operating income (loss) | (6,074 | ) | 510 | -1291.0% | |||||||
Corporate/other | (7,904 | ) | (12,013 | ) | 34.2% | ||||||
Restructuring | (7,817 | ) | (749 | ) | -943.7% | ||||||
Consolidated operating income (loss) | $ | (7,218 | ) | $ | 15,303 | -147.2% | |||||
Upholstery operating margin | 3.9% | 7.2% | |||||||||
Casegoods operating margin | 2.0% | 0.1% | |||||||||
Retail operating margin | -12.3% | 1.2% | |||||||||
Consolidated operating margin | -1.6% | 2.9% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | 7,652 | -184.3% | |||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing | |||||||||||
operations | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.15 | -180.0% |
N/M - not meaningful
Note: Restructuring
costs are included in consolidated gross profit.
Consolidated sales fell 12.7% in the second quarter due in large part to supply chain disruptions in our Upholstery Group which limited our ability to produce and fill orders and also as a result of soft retail conditions throughout the industry. The impact of the recent hurricanes created a supply shortage in a number of petroleum-based products, including TDI, a component of polyurethane foam which is a key raw material for many of our upholstery products. Our polyurethane vendors were unable to provide a normal level of supply during the quarter due to their inability to acquire TDI, and, therefore, this allocation of raw material impacted our production efficiency and hindered our ability to fill customer orders. The weakness in the current retail environment reflected a decline in consumer confidence during the quarter attributable to the significant hurricanes that affected large parts of the United States along with increasing interest rates and high energy prices. The sales declines due to soft retail conditions and the foam shortage were somewhat offset by an increase in sales by our Retail segment which resulted from the 21 stores acquired at the end of fiscal 2005.
Upholstery Group sales decreased 15.9% compared to the prior year second quarter. Our La-Z-Boy branded product sales decreased during the quarter due in large part to the inability of our supplier to ship polyurethane foam that impacted our ability to fill orders. This supply issue accounted for about 40% of the Upholstery Group sales decline. Sales were also down due to soft retail conditions. Although most of our La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores are independently owned, we do track the written sales activity of the total store system on a calendar quarter basis as an indicator of retail activity. The independently owned stores written sales were down 0.6% for same store sales, and the overall store system (including newly opened stores) sales were basically flat for the three month period ended in September 2005. Our non-branded Upholstery operating units also experienced decreasing sales due to the weak retail environment. Additionally, around 6% of our upholstery sales decline was related to several large regional chains declaring bankruptcy in the past 12 months.
Our Casegoods Group sales were down 9.0% compared to the prior year second quarter. The decrease in sales primarily occurred at Pennsylvania House due to market share erosion stemming from continued disruptions as they replace domestically produced product lines with Asian produced furniture. Although second quarter sales decreased for the Casegoods Group as a whole, the casegoods hospitality and health care business had another quarter of solid growth over the prior year second quarter, which was partly due to the economic recovery of the hospitality sector.
Retail Group sales increased 20.2% due to the acquisition of 21 stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. The remainder of our stores in the Retail Group experienced a weaker retail environment than last year. Excluding the three markets acquired in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, our Retail Group sales for the previously owned markets actually decreased during the second quarter. The increase in Retail Group sales from the 21 stores acquired at the end of fiscal 2005 did not fully correspond to an increase in consolidated sales due to the fact that eight of these stores were consolidated as VIEs prior to our acquiring them in the fourth quarter of 2005.
The VIEs and elimination sales includes our intercompany sales eliminations to our company-owned stores in the Retail Group and the sales of our VIEs. Since we have fewer VIEs, our sales are lower in the current quarter and with Retail sales becoming larger, our eliminations of intercompany sales has increased.
Our gross profit as a percent of sales (gross margin) decreased in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 in comparison to the prior year second quarter due to the following:
o | We had restructuring expense of $7.8 million in the fiscal second quarter of 2006 in contrast to $0.7 million in the second quarter of 2005. The restructuring costs in fiscal 2006 related to the previously mentioned shutdown of our Canadian upholstery facility and negatively impacted gross margin by 1.7 percentage points. | |
o | The shortage in supply of polyurethane foam impacted our ability to fill customer orders for our products during the current year, and the lost sales and related plant inefficiencies reduced our gross margin by about 1 percentage point. | |
o | Our plywood parts cutting facility in Newton, MS, which produces frame parts for our La-Z-Boy operating unit, sustained severe structural damage from a tornado during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. While we were able to shift production to other facilities, we incurred production inefficiencies and unfavorable manufacturing variances which reduced gross margin in the quarter. |
The decreases in gross profit were
offset somewhat by the following:
o | In the second quarter of last year we experienced significant price increases in raw materials, especially in raw steel. Raw steel prices remain high but have stabilized in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005 we increased our selling prices to our customers due to the high raw material costs, which helped offset the negative impact steel prices had on our margins in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. | |
o | Our company-owned La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores in the Retail Group are a larger part of our consolidated results in fiscal 2006, and since retail sales generally carry a higher gross margin than our manufacturing units, it had a more significant impact than in fiscal 2005, somewhat offsetting the negative impact of the above issues. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (S,G&A) decreased in fiscal 2006 in dollar amount compared to the prior year, but increased as a percentage of sales. The overall dollar decrease in S,G&A was a function of the decrease in sales; however, the fixed nature of many of these costs contributed to an increase in S,G&A as a percent of sales. Most of the increase in S,G&A percentage was attributable to the Retail Group due to the following:
o | The increased relative size of the Retail Group increased consolidated S,G&A because the Retail Group has a higher S,G&A structure. | |
o | We incurred additional expenses related to the 21 acquired stores including increased advertising and other selling expenses as well as costs involved in establishing new warehousing for two of the locations. | |
o | Our company-owned same stores sales were down, therefore we were not able to absorb our fixed expenses resulting in an increase in S,G&A as a percent of sales. Lack of critical mass in many of the markets makes it difficult to sustain profitability. In addition, some of the real estate in our acquired markets is in poor locations. Relocation of these stores will need to be completed to increase profitability in these markets. |
Offsetting the increase in S,G&A expense as a percent of sales was the reversal of certain incentive plan accruals due to our current quarter performance. This amounted to a 0.6% reduction in S,G&A expense as a percentage of net sales. In addition, we sold our Englander bedding trade name during the quarter which resulted in a gain that reduced S,G&A expense by 0.4% of net sales.
Our operating margin in the fiscal 2006 second quarter was (1.6)%, which included 1.7 percentage points of restructuring costs. The Casegoods Group operating margin increased but margins were down significantly at our Upholstery and Retail Groups. The operating margin for fiscal 2005 was 2.9% and included 0.1 percentage points of restructuring costs.
The Upholstery Group operating margin was impacted by lower sales volume due to the above mentioned raw material supply issue as well as a soft retail environment. Although, some of the Upholstery Group operating units experienced some relief on the high raw materials prices costs (i.e. steel) experienced in fiscal 2005, the shortage in polyurethane, and related plant disruptions offset these savings.
Our Casegoods Group operating margin increased over the prior year due to the increased operating margin in casegoods hospitality and health care business and improvements resulting from our continuing transition to our import model for residential casegoods. Although Pennsylvania House continues to operate below our desired operating level, the significant changes that were made in the overhead structure as a result of transitioning to a fully-imported business model limited the negative impact on the Casegoods Group as a whole. The Casegoods Group has been on a positive trend making steady progress in improving year over year quarterly operating margins since the third quarter of last year as shown in the chart below.
Casegoods Operating Margins
|
Fiscal 2004 |
Fiscal 2005
|
Fiscal 2006
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Quarter | 0.9 | % | 0.5 | % | 4.1 | % | |||||
Second Quarter | 1.7 | % | 0.1 | % | 2.0 | % | |||||
Third Quarter | -0.3 | % | 1.9 | % | |||||||
Fourth Quarter | 0.2 | % | 2.1 | % |
Our Retail Group operating
margin decreased by 13.5 percentage points in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 in
comparison to the second quarter of fiscal 2005. Two of the three markets acquired in the
2005 fourth quarter were operating at significant losses and were reported as VIEs in the
prior periods and contributed to operating losses during the quarter. Also, the decrease
in operating margin was due in part to the decrease in same store sales volume. With the
acquisition of new markets and a slow retail environment, we increased advertising
spending. Consequently, due to these acquisitions and an overall soft retail environment,
this quarter our retail operating results were below our expectations. We anticipate that
it will take some time to turn around these under-performing stores.
Interest expense increased during the second quarter of 2006 compared to the prior year quarter due to increases in interest rates on floating rate debt equating to an increase of about 1% in our effective interest rate. Our weighted average debt was down slightly in the current year compared to last years second quarter.
Our effective tax rate was 35.6% in the fiscal 2006 second quarter compared to 38.0% in the second quarter of fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate related to the restructuring charges incurred at our Canadian upholstery operation, which is generally taxed at a lower rate.
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | Six months ended |
Percent change |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
|
|||||||||
Upholstery sales | $ | 634,849 | $ | 697,564 | -9.0% | ||||||
Casegoods sales | 208,937 | 219,883 | -5.0% | ||||||||
Retail sales | 101,900 | 79,416 | 28.3% | ||||||||
VIEs/eliminations | (39,594 | ) | (20,996 | ) | N/M | ||||||
Consolidated sales | $ | 906,092 | $ | 975,867 | -7.1% | ||||||
Consolidated gross profit | $ | 198,848 | $ | 212,168 | -6.3% | ||||||
Consolidated gross margin | 21.9% | 21.7% | |||||||||
Consolidated S, G& A | $ | 198,165 | $ | 200,919 | -1.4% | ||||||
S,G& A as a percent of sales | 21.9% | 20.6% | |||||||||
Upholstery operating income | $ | 27,718 | $ | 40,673 | -31.9% | ||||||
Casegoods operating income | 6,457 | 580 | 1013.3% | ||||||||
Retail operating income (loss) | (11,482 | ) | 1,025 | -1220.2% | |||||||
Corporate/other | (14,193 | ) | (19,880 | ) | 28.6% | ||||||
Restructuring | (7,817 | ) | (11,149 | ) | 29.9% | ||||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 683 | $ | 11,249 | -93.9% | ||||||
Upholstery operating margin | 4.4% | 5.8% | |||||||||
Casegoods operating margin | 3.1% | 0.3% | |||||||||
Retail operating margin | -11.3% | 1.3% | |||||||||
Consolidated operating margin | 0.1% | 1.2% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (3,239 | ) | $ | 4,000 | -181.0% | |||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing | |||||||||||
operations | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.08 | -175.0% |
N/M - not meaningful
Note: Restructuring
costs are included in consolidated gross profit.
Sales
Consolidated sales declined 7.1% in the first half of the year. We acquired 21 new stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005; however, since two of the markets acquired, containing eight stores, were consolidated as VIEs in the previous years first six months, the increase in their sales for the Retail Group was offset by a corresponding decrease in our VIEs sales. Excluding the 21 recently acquired stores, Retail Group sales for our previously owned markets decreased in the first six months of fiscal 2006. Our Upholstery and Casegoods Groups sales were also down when compared to the prior year first six months due in large part to a weak retail environment attributable to weak consumer confidence and the supply shortage of polyurethane foam, previously mentioned.
Upholstery Group sales were down 9.0% year over year. Approximately 40% of the decrease in Upholstery Group sales for the first six months related to the polyurethane supply shortage, which limited our ability to fill customer orders. Sales were also down due to overall weakness at retail. Although most of our La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores are independently owned, we do track the written sales activity of the total store system as an indicator of retail activity. The independently owned stores written sales decreased 1.2% for same store sales and the overall store system (including newly opened stores) sales increased by approximately 1.7% for the six month period ending in September 2005. Some of our other Upholstery operating units also experienced decreasing sales due to soft retail conditions. Additionally, around 9% of our upholstery sales decline was related to several large regional chains declaring bankruptcy in the past 12 months.
Our Casegoods Group sales decreased 5.0% compared to the prior year first six months. The decrease in sales primarily occurred at Pennsylvania House due to market share erosion stemming from continued disruptions as they replace domestically produced product lines with Asian produced furniture. Although sales decreased for the Casegoods Group as a whole during the period, the casegoods hospitality and health care business continued to show sales growth over the prior year six months, partly due to the economic recovery of the hospitality sector.
Retail Group sales increased 28.3% due to the acquisition of 21 stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. Eight of these stores were consolidated as VIEs prior to acquiring them in the fourth quarter. Excluding the 21 recently acquired stores, Retail Group sales for our previously owned markets actually decreased in the first six months of fiscal 2006 due to slow retail activity.
The VIEs and elimination sales went from ($21.0) million in the first half of fiscal 2005 to ($39.6) million in the first half of fiscal 2006. Since we have fewer VIEs in the current year than in the comparable prior year period, our sales in this category were significantly less. In addition, our elimination of intercompany sales to our company-owned stores in the Retail Group increased due the increase in size of our Retail Group.
Our gross profit as a percent of sales (gross margin) increased slightly in the first six months of fiscal 2006 in comparison to the prior year first six months due to the following:
o | Our La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores are a larger part of our consolidated results in fiscal 2006, and since retail sales generally carry a higher gross margin than our manufacturing units it had a more significant impact than in fiscal 2005. | |
o | In the first half of last year we experienced significant price increases in raw materials, especially in raw steel. Raw steel prices remain high but have stabilized in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2005 we increased our selling prices to our customers due to the high raw material costs, which helped increase our margins in the first six months of fiscal 2006. | |
o | We had restructuring expense of $7.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006 and $11.1 million in the first six months of 2005. The restructuring costs decreased the gross margin by 0.9 percentage points in 2006 and 1.1 percentage points in 2005. |
The overall increase in gross margin in the first six months of fiscal 2006 was offset by the following:
o | We lost substantial sales in the Upholstery Group during the period resulting from the polyurethane shortage, which prevented us from producing and filling customer orders that we otherwise could have completed and shipped. The impact of the polyurethane shortage decreased gross margin by 0.6 percentage points in the first six months of fiscal 2006. | |
o | In fiscal 2006, a tornado severely damaged our plywood parts cutting facility in Newton, MS, which produces frame parts for our La-Z-Boy operating unit. While we were able to shift production to other facilities, we incurred production inefficiencies and unfavorable manufacturing variances which reduced gross margin slightly for the first six months of fiscal 2006. | |
o | Following the acquisition of 21 stores in three markets by our Retail Group near the end of fiscal 2005, in the current year we refreshed merchandise and cleared out older inventory from the newly acquired stores, which resulted in a lower gross margin for our Retail Group. |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (S,G&A) decreased in dollar amount in fiscal 2006 compared to the prior year, but increased as a percentage of sales. The dollar amount decrease in S,G&A was related to the decline in sales; however, due to the fixed nature of many S,G&A expenses and the drop in sales, the S,G&A as a percentage increased. The higher level of S,G&A percentage was mainly attributable to the Retail Group as follows:
o | The increased relative size of the Retail Group increased consolidated S,G&A because the Retail Group has a higher S,G&A structure. | |
o | We incurred additional expenses in the Retail Group related to the 21 acquired stores, including increased advertising, higher occupancy costs and other selling expenses as well as transitional costs which added to S,G&A for the first six months of fiscal 2006. |
Also included in S,G&A expense in
fiscal 2006 was the biannual conference held in the first quarter for dealers of the
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries store network. Somewhat offsetting these increases in
S,G&A expense were gains recognized during the current year on a long-lived asset that
we sold, which reduced S,G&A as a percent of sales by 0.4%, and the reversal of
certain incentive plan accruals, which accounted for a 0.3% reduction in expense.
Our consolidated operating margin was 0.1% for the first six months of fiscal 2006 and included 0.9 percentage points of restructuring costs. Operating margin in the prior year six months was 1.2% and included 1.1 percentage points of restructuring charges.
The Upholstery Group operating margin decreased due to lower sales volume related to supply chain disruptions and soft retail conditions. The Upholstery group benefited from selling price increases since the same period last year which somewhat offset these factors.
Our Casegoods Group operating margin increased over the prior year due to the increased operating margin in our casegoods hospitality and health care business and improvements resulting from our continuing transition to our import model for residential casegoods. Pennsylvania House continued to perform below our desired operating level, but the significant changes that were made in the overhead structure of this unit as a result of transitioning to a fully-imported business model limited the negative impact on the Casegoods Group as a whole.
Our Retail Group operating margin decreased by 12.6 percentage points in the first six months of fiscal 2006 in comparison to the first six months of fiscal 2005. Two of the three markets acquired were operating at significant losses and were reported as VIEs in the prior periods and contributed to operating losses during the current year. We refreshed merchandise at our newly acquired locations moving out older inventory which resulted in a lower operating margin. The acquired stores also incurred transitional costs in the first six months. The decrease in operating profit was due in part to the decrease in same store sales volume. Additionally, due to the acquisition of new markets and a slow retail environment we increased advertising spending. We also had an increase in occupancy costs and selling expenses. Consequently, due to these acquisitions and an overall soft retail environment, our retail operating results for the first six months of fiscal 2006 were below our expectations. We anticipate that it will take some time to turn around these under-performing stores.
Interest expense for the first half of 2006 was higher than 2005 due to rising interest rates on floating rate debt equating to an increase of about 1% in our effective interest rate. Our weighted average debt was down slightly in the first six months of the current year compared to the same period last year.
Our effective tax rate was 33.1% in the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to 38.0% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate related to the restructuring charges incurred at our Canadian upholstery operation, which is generally taxed at a lower rate.
La-Z-Boy Furniture Galleries® stores that are not operated by us are operated by 115 independent dealers. These stores sell La-Z-Boy manufactured product as well as various accessories purchased from approved La-Z-Boy vendors. In some cases we have extended credit beyond normal trade terms to the independent dealers, made direct loans and/or guaranteed certain loans or leases. Most of these independent dealers have sufficient equity to carry out their principal operating activities without subordinated financial support; however, there are certain independent dealers that we have determined may not have sufficient equity. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, we began to consolidate variable interest entities of which we were deemed the primary beneficiary as of April 24, 2004. The tables below show the impact on our consolidated balance sheet at October 29, 2005 and April 30, 2005 and statement of operations for the second quarter and six months ended October 29, 2005 and October 23, 2004. The amounts reflected in the table include the elimination of related payables, receivables, sales, cost of sales, and interest as well as profit in inventory.
Impact of VIEs on our consolidated balance sheet:
VIEs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) |
10/29/05 |
4/30/05
|
||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and equivalents | $ | 1,903 | $ | 1,699 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net | (14,451 | ) (1) | (9,131 | ) (1) | ||||
Inventories, net | 10,473 | 7,211 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 8,700 | 7,199 | ||||||
Other current assets | 1,590 | 1,226 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets | 8,215 | 8,204 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 11,177 | 8,431 | ||||||
Intangibles | 8,122 | 7,714 | ||||||
Other long-term assets | (18,301 | ) (1) | (14,169 | ) (1) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets | $ | 9,213 | $ | 10,180 | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities and shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 501 | $ | -- | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 851 | 1,934 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 1,060 | 329 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 3,881 | 3,523 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities | 6,293 | 5,786 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 7,306 | 6,256 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | -- | -- | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities | (1,300 | ) | (1,300 | ) | ||||
Shareholders' equity (deficit) | (3,086 | ) | (562 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 9,213 | $ | 10,180 | ||||
|
|
(1) Reflects the elimination of intercompany accounts and notes receivable.
Impact of VIEs on our consolidated income statement:
Quarter Ended
|
Six Months
Ended
| |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04 |
||||||||||
Sales | $ | 7,848 | (2) | $ | 9,654 | (2) | $ | 16,434 | (2) | $ | 23,295 | (2) | ||
Cost of sales | 442 | (266 | ) | 2,908 | 676 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross profit | 7,406 | 9,920 | 13,526 | 22,619 | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative | 9,660 | 12,712 | 16,461 | $ | 27,388 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating loss | (2,254 | ) | (2,792 | ) | (2,935 | ) | $ | (4,769 | ) | |||||
Interest expense | 106 | 69 | 216 | 236 | ||||||||||
Other expense, net | (321 | ) (3) | (1,093 | ) (3) | (799 | ) (3) | (2,387 | ) (3) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Pre-tax loss | (2,681 | ) | (3,954 | ) | (3,950 | ) | (7,392 | ) | ||||||
Income tax benefit | (1,019 | ) | (1,503 | ) | (1,501 | ) | (2,809 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net loss from continuing operations | $ | (1,662 | ) | $ | (2,451 | ) | $ | (2,449 | ) | $ | (4,583 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
(2) Includes the elimination of intercompany sales and cost of sales.
(3) Includes the elimination of intercompany interest income and interest expense.
Our total assets decreased by 2.9% as compared to April 2005. Our total debt increased by $1.0 million in comparison to the end of the 2005 fiscal year.
Our sources of cash liquidity include cash and equivalents, cash from operations and amounts available under credit facilities. These sources have been adequate for day-to-day operations, stock repurchases, dividends to shareholders and capital expenditures. We expect these sources of liquidity to continue to be adequate for the future. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2006 are planned at $28 million to $32 million compared to $35 million in fiscal 2005. There were no material commitments for capital expenditures at October 29, 2005. As of October 29, 2005, we had unused lines of credit and commitments of $173.0 million under several credit arrangements.
The following table illustrates the main components of our cash flows:
(Unaudited, amounts in thousands) | Six MonthsEnded | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash Flows From (Used For) |
10/29/05 |
10/23/04
| ||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||
Net income (loss), depreciation and deferred taxes | $ | 5,679 | $ | 19,122 | ||||
Restructuring | 7,817 | 11,149 | ||||||
Working capital and other | 5,300 | (54,360 | ) | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Cash provided from operating activities | 18,796 | (24,089 | ) | |||||
Investing activities | (21,356 | ) | (15,432 | ) | ||||
Financing activities | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (10,889 | ) | (2,476 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in debt | 18 | 43,985 | ||||||
Other financing activities and exchange rate changes | (9,237 | ) | (7,193 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (22,668 | ) | $ | (5,205 | ) | ||
|
|
Operating activities
The increase in 2006 operating cash
flows was due mainly to a source of cash of $28.6 million in receivables. The decrease in
receivables in comparison to April 2005 was due to the seasonality of our first quarter
2006 coupled with decreased sales in the second quarter of 2006.
Investing activities
During the first half of fiscal
2006 and fiscal 2005, net cash used in investing activities was $21.4 million and $15.4
million, respectively. The increase in cash used for investing activities in fiscal 2006
was primarily reflected in an increase in investments. At April 30, 2005 we had
significant cash and cash equivalents which were invested in longer term assets during
fiscal 2006.
Financing activities
Our financing activities included
borrowings and payments on our debt facilities, dividend payments, issuances of stock and
stock repurchases. We used $20.3 million of cash in financing activities in the first half
of fiscal 2006 compared to $32.9 million provided by financing activities of cash in the
first half of fiscal 2005. During the first half of fiscal 2006 we increased cash from
operating activities and were able to pay dividends and repurchase common stock. Our net
borrowings were $44.0 million less in the fiscal 2006 first six months in comparison to
the prior year.
Our debt-to-capitalization ratio was 31.1% at October 29, 2005, 30.0% at April 30, 2005 and 34.1% at October 23, 2004.
On
November 11, 2005, we executed a consent and waiver with the lenders under our credit agreement clarifying that the assets, liabilities, and operating
results of VIEs are to be excluded for purposes of covenant calculations under
the agreement. On November 22, 2005, we executed an amendment to the
credit agreement to modify its fixed charge coverage ratio requirements and
interest rate provisions.
The following table summarizes our
contractual obligations of the types specified:
Payments
by Period
| |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
Total
|
Less than
1 Year |
1-3
Years
|
4-5
Years
|
More than
5 Years | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 194,897 | $ | 1,584 | $ | 40,378 | $ | 89,710 | $ | 63,225 | |||||||
Capital lease obligations | 2,596 | 1,113 | 1,362 | 109 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations | 246,615 | 33,515 | 61,521 | 51,215 | 100,364 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities not | |||||||||||||||||
reflected on our balance sheet | 1,639 | 1,306 | 202 | 131 | -- | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations | $ | 445,747 | $ | 37,518 | $ | 103,463 | $ | 141,165 | $ | 163,601 |
In addition to the above obligations, we have guaranteed various mortgages and leases of dealers with proprietary stores. The total amount of these guarantees is $7.7 million. Of this, $2.6 million will expire within one year, $4.6 million in one to three years and $0.5 million in four to five years. In recent years, we have increased our imports of Casegoods product and leather and fabric for upholstery product. At October 29, 2005, we had $32.5 million in open purchase orders with foreign casegoods manufacturers and $19.9 million in open purchase orders with foreign leather and fabric manufacturers. Some of these open purchase orders are cancelable.
Continuing compliance with existing federal, state and local statutes dealing with protection of the environment is not expected to have a material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings, competitive position or liquidity.
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of company stock. On October 28, 1987, our Board of Directors announced the authorization of the plan to repurchase company stock. The plan originally authorized 1.0 million shares and subsequent to October 1987, 22.0 million additional shares have been added to this plan for repurchase. As of October 29, 2005, 5.9 million additional shares could be purchased pursuant to this authorization.
In December 2004, the The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This statement replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires companies to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in accounting for shared-based payment transactions with employees and to record compensation cost for all stock awards granted after the required effective date and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. In addition, we are required to record compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption. SFAS 123(R) will be effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Although management has not yet determined the final impact that SFAS 123(R) will have on our financial position and results of operations, we do not expect the impact to be materially different than the effect shown in Note 9 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations on March 30, 2005. The interpretation will result in (a) more consistent recognition of liabilities relating to asset retirement obligations, (b) more information about expected future cash outflows associated with those obligations, and (c) more information about investments in long-lived assets because additional asset retirement costs will be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the assets. Interpretation 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of Interpretation No. 47 on our financial position and results of operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. SFAS No. 154 is a replacement of APB No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. The reporting of a correction of an error by restating previously issued financial statements is also addressed by SFAS No. 154. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We will be adopting this pronouncement beginning in our fiscal year 2007.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the decision was made to close our Canadian upholstery manufacturing facility due to underutilization of capacity. The plant closure will occur in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 and production will be absorbed in other upholstery facilities resulting in better production efficiencies. Approximately 413 jobs are expected to be eliminated as a result of this closure. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, pre-tax restructuring charges were $8.0 million, or $0.10 per diluted share, covering severance and benefits, appropriate adjustments to our pension liability and the write-down of certain fixed assets. Severance costs and other costs were expensed in accordance with SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits and SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. There were 380 employees remaining at this facility as of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006. We expect to dispose of this plant by sale. The write-down was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Somewhat offsetting the expense for the Canadian restructuring was a gain of $0.2 million relating to the sale of a facility idled as part of a previous restructuring.
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2005. There were no new accounting pronouncements that had a material effect on our second quarter or our critical accounting policies.
Although we continue to make steady progress in our cost structure and believe that we have a solid and relevant business model in place in each of our three segments, we remain concerned about the macro economic environment.
We are currently expecting sales for the January quarter to be flat compared to last years third quarter, and we anticipate reported earnings for the third quarter to be in the range of $0.13 $0.17 per diluted share which includes up to $0.01 in after-tax restructuring charges, versus the $0.21 we earned per diluted share from continuing operations in the same quarter of fiscal 2005, which included an after-tax restructuring charge of $0.03 per share.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. The majority of our exposure to interest rate risk results from our floating rate $150 million revolving credit facility under which we had $45 million borrowed at October 29, 2005. Management estimates that a 1% change in interest rates would not have a material impact on the results of operations for fiscal 2006 based upon the year end levels of exposed liabilities.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in the value of foreign currencies. Our exposure to changes in the value of foreign currencies is reduced through our use of foreign currency forward contracts from time to time. At October 29, 2005, we had foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding relating to the Canadian dollar. Substantially all of our imported purchased parts are denominated in U.S. dollars. We believe that gains or losses resulting from changes in the value of foreign currencies will not be material to our results from operations in fiscal year 2006.
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information that is required to be timely disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely fashion. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we sold shares of our common stock to our non-employee directors pursuant to our Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on the exemption provided in Section 4(2) of the Act. In accordance with the terms of the plan, we sold these shares to our non-employee directors upon their acceptance of awards granted to them to purchase shares at 25% of their fair market value on the date of grant. The following table shows the date of each sale, the number of shares sold, and the per share and aggregate sales prices.
Date of Sale |
Number of Shares Sold |
Per Share Price |
Aggregate Price |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
August 2005 |
16,000 |
$ |
3.3925 |
$ |
54,280 |
Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of company stock. On October 28, 1987, our Board of Directors announced the authorization of the plan to repurchase company stock. The plan originally authorized 1.0 million shares and subsequent to October 1987, 22.0 million additional shares have been added to this plan for repurchase. As of October 29, 2005, 5.9 million additional shares could be purchased pursuant to this authorization. The following table summarizes our repurchases of company stock during the period covered by this report:
(Amounts in thousands) |
Total number of shares
repurchased |
Average price paid per
share |
Total number of shares
purchased as part of the publicly announced repurchase program |
Maximum number of
shares that may yet be purchased | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal August (July 31 - September 3) | 200 | $ | 13.88 | 200 | 5,953 | ||||||||
Fiscal September (September 4 - October 1) | 60 | $ | 14.44 | 60 | 5,893 | ||||||||
Fiscal October (October 2 - October 29) | -- | -- | -- | 5,893 | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Fiscal Second Quarter | 260 | $ | 14.01 | 260 | 5,893 | ||||||||
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of La-Z-Boy Incorporated was held on August 23, 2005. The shareholders elected four directors for three-year terms expiring in 2008 and ratified the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2006.
Proposal Election of Directors: |
Shares Voted |
Percent Shares |
Shares |
|
Kurt L. Darrow | 44,055,013 |
95 |
% | 2,207,432 |
James W. Johnston | 42,701,812 | 92 | % | 3,560,633 |
Dr. H. George Levy | 44,033,068 | 95 | % | 2,229,377 |
Donald L. Mitchell | 43,607,335 | 94 | % | 2,655,110 |
Proposal |
Shares Voted |
Shares Voted |
Shares |
|
Ratify the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for FYE 2006 | 45,559,499 |
280,126 |
422,820 |
(a) |
Exhibits |
||
(4.1) |
Consent and Waiver, dated as of November 11, 2005 to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004. |
||
(4.2) |
First Amendment, dated as of November 22, 2005 to Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004. |
||
(11) |
Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings - See note 4 to the financial statements included in this report. |
||
(31) | Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
||
(32) | Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(b) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LA-Z-BOY
INCORPORATED (Registrant) |
Date: November 22, 2005
BY: /S/ Louis M. Riccio, Jr. Louis M. Riccio, Jr. Corporate Controller On behalf of the registrant and as Chief Accounting Officer |
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Index |
---|---|
(4.1) |
Consent and Waiver to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004. |
(4.2) |
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004. |
(11) | Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings See note 4 to the financial statements included in this report. |
(31) | Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
(32) | Certifications of Executive Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(b) |
Exhibit 4.1
CONSENT AND
WAIVER TO THE CREDIT AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF MARCH 30, 2004
November 11, 2005
Reference is made to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 (as amended, modified, supplemented, restated or amended and restated from time to time, the Credit Agreement) among LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation, (the Borrower), those Subsidiaries of the Borrower identified as a Guarantor on the signature pages thereto (individually a Guarantor and collectively the Guarantors), the Lenders party hereto, and WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the Administrative Agent). Terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Credit Agreement.
The Borrower has requested that the Required Lenders (i) permit the Borrower to exclude the impact of any VIE (as defined below) in calculating Consolidated Assets, Consolidated Tangible Net Worth, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Funded Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio and Total Capitalization, except with respect to any Funded Debt of such VIE that is guaranteed by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (the VIE Exclusion) and (ii) agree to increase the amount by which the aggregate benefit liabilities under each of the Plans may exceed the aggregate current value of the assets allocable to such benefit liabilities, as set forth in Section 5.10(b) of the Credit Agreement, from $500,000 to $7,500,000 in the aggregate for all Plans (the Unfunded Plan Liability Increase). The Borrower has also requested that the Required Lenders waive the Events of Default resulting from the officers certificates delivered to the Administrative Agent pursuant to Section 6.2(a) of the Credit Agreement since the Closing Date (the Officers Compliance Certificates) containing incorrect calculations of the financial covenants set forth in Section 6.7 of the Credit Agreement (the Acknowledged Events of Default).
The Required Lenders hereby (i) consent to the VIE Exclusion and the Unfunded Plan Liability Increase, (ii) waive, on a one-time basis, the Acknowledged Events of Default; provided that, notwithstanding any miscalculations in the Officers Compliance Certificates, the Borrower and its Subsidiaries shall have been in compliance with the financial covenants set forth in Section 6.7 of the Credit Agreement during the periods covered by such Officers Compliance Certificates, and (iii) agree (with the Credit Parties) to define Consolidated Assets, Consolidated Tangible Net Worth, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Funded Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio, Total Capitalization and VIE as set forth below.
Consolidated Assets means, at any time, the amount representing the assets of the Borrower and the Subsidiaries that would appear on a consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries at such time prepared in accordance with GAAP; provided that the assets of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of Consolidated Assets. |
Consolidated Tangible Net Worth means, with respect to the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, at the time any determination thereof is to be made, the excess of (i) the net book value of the assets on a consolidated basis (excluding from assets however, net amounts due, if any, from the officers and employees or Affiliates, any patents, patent rights, trademarks, trade names, franchises, copyrights, licenses, goodwill and similar intangible assets) after all appropriate deductions determined in accordance with GAAP (including, without limitation, reserves for doubtful receivables, obsolescence, etc.) minus (ii) Total Liabilities; provided, that (a) the foregoing determination of Consolidated Tangible Net Worth shall not be reduced for deferred income taxes and (b) the net book value of assets and the Total Liabilities of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of Consolidated Tangible Net Worth. |
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio means, as of any date of determination thereof, a ratio (a) the numerator of which shall be equal to the sum of (a) Consolidated Net Income plus (to the extent deducted in determining Consolidated Net Income) (ii) income taxes, (iii) Interest Expense of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (iv) Rentals of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (v) depreciation and amortization of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, in each case, during the preceding twelve months and (b) the denominator of which shall be the sum of Interest Expense of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and Rentals of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis for such period; provided that the Consolidated Net Income, income taxes, Interest Expense, Rentals, depreciation and amortization of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of such ratio. |
Funded Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio means, as of any date of determination thereof, a ratio (a) the numerator of which shall be Funded Debt of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries and (b) the denominator of which shall be Total Capitalization of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries; provided that the Funded Debt and Total Capitalization of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of such ratio, except with respect to any Funded Debt of such VIE that is guaranteed by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries. |
Total Capitalization means, at any time, the sum of (a) Funded Debt of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis plus (b) Consolidated Tangible Net Worth; provided that the Funded Debt and Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of Total Capitalization, except with respect to any Funded Debt of such VIE that is guaranteed by the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries. |
VIE means a Variable Interest Entity (as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R) of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries. |
The
consent, agreement and waiver set forth in this letter agreement (this
Consent) shall be effective only to the extent specifically set forth
herein and shall not (a) be construed as a waiver of any breach or default other than as
specifically waived herein nor as a waiver of any breach or default of which the Lenders
have not been informed by the Credit Parties, (b) affect the right of the Lenders to
demand compliance by the Credit Parties with all terms and conditions of the Credit
Agreement, except as specifically modified or waived by this Consent, (c) be deemed a
waiver of any transaction or future action on the part of the Credit Parties requiring the
Lenders or the Required Lenders consent or approval under the Credit
Agreement, or (d) except as waived hereby, be deemed or construed to be a waiver or
release of, or a limitation upon, the Administrative Agents or the Lenders
exercise of any rights or remedies under the Credit Agreement or any other Credit
Document, whether arising as a consequence of any Event of Default which may now exist or
otherwise, all such rights and remedies hereby being expressly reserved. All references to
the Credit Agreement in each of the Credit Documents shall hereafter mean the Credit
Agreement as amended and modified by this Consent.
By their execution below, each of the Credit Parties hereby reaffirms their obligations under the Credit Documents and represents and warrants that (i) the representations and warranties set forth in Section 5 of the Credit Agreement are true and correct as of the date hereof (except for those which expressly relate to an earlier date) and (ii) no Default or Event of Default exists after giving effect to this Consent.
This Consent may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one instrument. This Consent shall be effective as of the date first above written upon receipt by the Administrative Agent of a signature page to this Consent (via facsimile or otherwise) from each of the Credit Parties and the Required Lenders. Receipt by the Administrative Agent of a facsimile signature page to this Consent shall constitute an original signature page (and shall constitute a representation by the party delivering such signature page that an original signature page will follow). A copy of this Consent executed by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent shall constitute definitive evidence that this Consent has been executed by all requisite parties. This Consent shall constitute a Credit Document under the terms of the Credit Agreement and shall be subject to all of the terms set forth in the Credit Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Borrower, the Guarantors and the Required Lenders have caused this Consent to be duly executed on the date first above written.
BORROWER: | LA-Z-BOY
INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation By: Name: Title: |
GUARANTORS: | KINCAID
FURNITURE COMPANY INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation
ENGLAND, INC., a Michigan corporation BAUHAUS U.S.A., INC., a Mississippi corporation LA-Z-BOY GREENSBORO, INC., a North Carolina corporation LZB MANUFACTURING, INC., a Michigan corporation By: Name: Title: |
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDERS: |
WACHOVIA
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent and as a Lender By: Name: Title: |
LENDERS (continued): | By: Name: Title: |
Exhibit 4.2
FIRST
AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF MARCH 30, 2004
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this Amendment), dated as of November 22, 2005, is by and among LA-Z-BOY INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation, (the Borrower), those Subsidiaries of the Borrower identified as a Guarantor on the signature pages hereto (individually a Guarantor and collectively the Guarantors), the Lenders party hereto, and WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the Administrative Agent).
WHEREAS, the Borrower, the Guarantors, the several banks and other financial institutions as may from time to time become parties thereto (the Lenders), and the Administrative Agent have entered into that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 (as previously modified by that certain Consent and Waiver dated November 11, 2005 and as further amended, modified, supplemented, restated or amended and restated from time to time, the Credit Agreement; capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Credit Agreement);
WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested certain amendments to the Credit Agreement as more fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Required Lenders have agreed to such amendments, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements hereinafter set forth, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.1 Definitions.
(a) The definition of Applicable Percentage in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: |
Applicable Percentage shall mean, for any day, the rate per annum set forth below opposite the applicable level then in effect, it being understood that the Applicable Percentage for (a) Revolving Loans that are Alternate Base Rate Loans shall be the percentage set forth under the column Alternate Base Rate Margin for Revolving Loans, (b) Revolving Loans that are LIBOR Rate Loans shall be the percentage set forth under the column LIBOR Rate Margin for Revolving Loans and Standby Letter of Credit Fee, (c) the Letter of Credit Fee shall be the percentage set forth under the column (i) LIBOR Rate Margin for Revolving Loans and Standby Letter of Credit Fee for standby letters of credit and (ii) Commercial and Trade Letters of Credit Fee for commercial and trade letters of credit and (d) the Facility Fee shall be the percentage set forth under the column Facility Fee: |
Level
|
Funded Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio |
Alternate Base Rate Margin for Revolving Loans |
LIBOR Rate Margin for Revolving Loans and Standby Letter of Credit Fee |
Commercial and Trade Letters of Credit Fee |
Facility Fee |
I | > .400 to 1.0 | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.400% | 0.20% |
II |
< .400 to 1.0 but > .250 to 1.0 |
0.00% | 0.55% | 0.275% | 0.15% |
III | < .250 to 1.0 | 0.00% | 0.475% | 0.2375% | 0.125% |
The Applicable Percentage shall, in each case, be determined and adjusted quarterly on the date five (5) Business Days after the date on which the Administrative Agent has received from the Borrower the financial information and certifications required to be delivered to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders in accordance with the provisions of Sections 6.1(a) and (b) and Section 6.2(a) (each an Interest Determination Date). Such Applicable Percentage shall be effective from such Interest Determination Date until the next such Interest Determination Date. The initial Applicable Percentages shall be based on Level II until the first Interest Determination Date occurring after the delivery of the officers compliance certificate pursuant to Section 6.2(a) for the period ending April 24, 2004. After the Closing Date, if the Borrower shall fail to provide the quarterly financial information and certifications in accordance with the provisions of Sections 6.1(a) and (b) and Section 6.2(a), the Applicable Percentage from such Interest Determination Date shall, on the date five (5) Business Days after the date by which the Borrower was so required to provide such financial information and certifications to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, be based on Level I until such time as such information and certifications are provided, whereupon the Level shall be determined by the then current Funded Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio. After the First Amendment Effective Date, if the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is less than 2.50 to 1.00 (as reported in the officers compliance certificate delivered pursuant to Section 6.2(a) for such fiscal quarter), each Level of the LIBOR Rate Margin for Revolving Loans and Standby Letter of Credit Fee and the Commercial and Trade Letters of Credit Fee shall be increased by 20 basis points from the first Interest Determination Date occurring after delivery of such officers compliance certificate until the Interest Determination Date occurring after the end of any fiscal quarter thereafter where the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is equal to or greater than 2.50 to 1.00 (as reported in the officers compliance certificate delivered pursuant to Section 6.2(a) for such fiscal quarter). |
(b) The definition of First Amendment Effective Date is hereby added to Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement to read as follows: |
First Amendment Effective Date shall mean November 22, 2005. |
(c) The definition of Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: |
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio means, as of any date of determination thereof, a ratio (a) the numerator of which shall be equal to the sum of (i) Consolidated Net Income plus (ii) (to the extent deducted in determining Consolidated Net Income) (A) income taxes, (B) Interest Expense of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (C) Rentals of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, (D) depreciation and amortization of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, in each case, during the preceding twelve months and (E) one-time cash restructuring charges (1) taken during the quarter ending October 29, 2005 in the amount of $7,900,000 and (2) taken during the quarter ending January 28, 2006 in an amount not to exceed $440,000, and (b) the denominator of which shall be the sum of Interest Expense of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and Rentals of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis for such period; provided that the Consolidated Net Income, income taxes, Interest Expense, Rentals, depreciation and amortization of any VIE shall not be included in the calculation of such ratio. |
1.2
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. Section 6.7(b) of
the Credit Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety to read as follows:
(b) Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. On a consolidated basis, maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter of greater than or equal to the following: |
Period |
Required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio |
Closing Date through October 29, 2005 |
2.50 to 1.00 |
October 30, 2005 through July 29, 2006 |
2.30 to 1.00 |
July 30, 2006 and thereafter |
2.50 to 1.00 |
2.1 Closing Conditions.
This Amendment shall
become effective as of the date first above written upon satisfaction of the
following conditions (in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the
Administrative Agent):
(a) Executed Amendment. Receipt by the Administrative Agent of a copy of this Amendment duly executed by each of the Credit Parties and the Required Lenders. |
(b) Organizational Documents. Receipt by the Administrative Agent of the following: |
(i) Resolutions. Copies of resolutions of the Board of Directors or their equivalent of each Credit Party approving and adopting this Amendment, the transactions contemplated herein and authorizing execution and delivery hereof, certified by a secretary or assistant secretary of such Credit Party to be true and correct and in force and effect as of the date hereof; |
(ii) Good Standing Certificate. Copies of certificates of good standing, existence or its equivalent of each of the Credit Parties certified as of a recent date by the appropriate Governmental Authorities of their state of organization; and |
(iii) Incumbency. An incumbency certificate of each Credit Party certified by a secretary or assistant secretary to be true and correct as of the date hereof. |
(c) Legal Opinions of Counsel. The Administrative Agent shall have received opinions of legal counsel for the Credit Parties, addressed to the Administrative Agent and the Lenders, which opinions shall be in form and substance acceptable to the Administrative Agent. |
(d) Fees. Receipt by the Administrative Agent, on behalf of each Lender that delivers to the Administrative Agent an executed signature page to this Amendment by 5:00 p.m. (EST) on November 22, 2005, of an amendment fee in an amount equal to 5 basis points on the aggregate Revolving Commitments of such approving Lenders. Additionally, receipt by the Administrative Agent of all fees and expenses of the Administrative Agent in connection with the arrangement, preparation, execution and delivery of this Amendment, including, without limitation, the reasonable fees and expenses of Moore & Van Allen PLLC. |
3.1 Amended Terms. All references to the Credit Agreement in each of the Credit Documents shall hereafter mean the Credit Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except as specifically amended hereby or otherwise agreed, all of the terms and provisions and conditions of each of the Credit Documents shall remain unchanged and are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect according to their respective terms. The amendments to the Credit Agreement set forth in this Amendment shall be effective from and after the date of this Amendment and shall not be applied retroactively.
3.2
Representations and Warranties of Credit Parties.
Each of the Credit Parties represents and
warrants as follows:
(a) It has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Amendment. |
(b) This Amendment has been duly executed and delivered by such Person and constitutes such Persons legal, valid and binding obligations, enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be subject to (i) bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance or transfer, moratorium or similar laws affecting creditors rights generally and (ii) general principles of equity (regardless of whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding at law or in equity). |
(c) No consent, approval, authorization or order of, or filing, registration or qualification with, any court or governmental authority or third party is required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by such Person of this Amendment. |
(d) The representations and warranties set forth in Section 5 of the Credit Agreement are true and correct as of the date hereof (except for those which expressly relate to an earlier date). |
(e) No Default or Event of Default exists after giving effect to this Amendment. |
3.3 Acknowledgment of Guarantors. The Guarantors acknowledge and consent
to all of the terms and conditions of this Amendment and agree that this Amendment and all
documents executed in connection herewith do not operate to reduce or discharge the
Guarantors obligations under the Credit Documents.
3.4 Credit Document. This Amendment shall constitute a Credit Document under the terms of the Credit Agreement.
3.5 Entirety. This Amendment and the other Credit Documents embody the entire agreement between the parties hereto and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, if any, relating to the subject matter hereof.
3.6 Counterparts; Telecopy. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart to this Amendment by telecopy shall be effective as an original and shall constitute a representation that an original will be delivered. A copy of this Amendment executed by the Borrower and the Administrative Agent shall constitute definitive evidence that this Amendment has been executed by all requisite parties.
3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
3.8 GOVERNING LAW. THIS AMENDMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES UNDER THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
3.9 Consent to Jurisdiction; Service of Process. The jurisdiction and service of process provisions set forth in Sections 11.14 of the Credit Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference, mutatis mutandis.
3.10 GENERAL RELEASE. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUIRED LENDERS ENTERING INTO THIS AMENDMENT, THE CREDIT PARTIES HEREBY RELEASE THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, THE LENDERS, AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTS AND THE LENDERS RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS, COUNSEL AND DIRECTORS FROM ANY AND ALL ACTIONS, CAUSES OF ACTION, CLAIMS, DEMANDS, DAMAGES AND LIABILITIES OF WHATEVER KIND OR NATURE, IN LAW OR IN EQUITY, NOW KNOWN OR UNKNOWN, SUSPECTED OR UNSUSPECTED TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY OF THE FOREGOING ARISES FROM ANY ACTION OR FAILURE TO ACT UNDER THE CREDIT AGREEMENT OR UNDER THE OTHER CREDIT DOCUMENTS ON OR PRIOR TO THE DATE HEREOF.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Borrower, the Guarantors and the Required Lenders have caused this Amendment to be duly executed on the date first above written.
BORROWER: | LA-Z-BOY
INCORPORATED, a Michigan corporation By: Name: Title: |
GUARANTORS: | KINCAID
FURNITURE COMPANY INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation
ENGLAND, INC., a Michigan corporation BAUHAUS U.S.A., INC., a Mississippi corporation LA-Z-BOY GREENSBORO, INC., a North Carolina corporation LZB MANUFACTURING, INC., a Michigan corporation By: Name: Title: |
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDERS: |
WACHOVIA
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent and as a Lender By: Name: Title: |
LENDERS (continued): | By: Name: Title: |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
I, Kurt L. Darrow, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of La-Z-Boy Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 22, 2005 | /s/
Kurt L. Darrow
Kurt L. Darrow Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
I, David M. Risley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of La-Z-Boy Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 22, 2005 | /s/
David M. Risley
David M. Risley Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT (32)
CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of La-Z-Boy Incorporated (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 29, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Kurt L. Darrow
Kurt L. Darrow
President and Chief Executive
Officer
November 22, 2005
/s/ David M.
Risley
David M. Risley
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
November 22, 2005
*The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.